# 1+4=5 2+5=12 3+6=21 5+8=

## 1+4=5 2+5=12 3+6=21 5+8= Zahlenrätsel schon mehr als 50.000 Mal geteilt

1+4=5. 2+5+5= 3+6+12= 4+7+21= 5+8+32= 6+9+45= 7+10+60=​ 8+11+77= oder: 1+4(x1)=5. 2+5(x2)= 3+6(x3)= . 1 + (1 x 4) =5. 2 + (2 x 5) = 3 + (3 x 6) = 8 + (8 x 11) = Besonders schlaue Menschen haben allerdings bei dem Rätsel ein Muster. 1 + 4 = 5. Wer sich nur die erste Zeile anschaut und dieses Rätsel als superleicht abtut, sollte Denn dort steht, dass 2 + 5 = 12 ist. 3 + 6 ergibt rein rechnerisch 9. Somit ergibt sich für die letzte Rechnung: 8 + 12 = 1 + 1 x 4 =5. 2 + 2 x 5 = 3 + 3 x 6 = 8 + 8 x 11 = Und auf welche Lösung kommen Sie? app-facebook. Randall Jones. about 4 years. Die Rechenaufgabe lautet: 1+4=5 2+5=12 3+6=21 5+8=? 5+8 ergibt rein rechnerisch 13 plus die 21 von oben ergibt wiederum

Die Rechenaufgabe lautet: 1+4=5 2+5=12 3+6=21 5+8=? 5+8 ergibt rein rechnerisch 13 plus die 21 von oben ergibt wiederum 1 + 4 = 5. Wer sich nur die erste Zeile anschaut und dieses Rätsel als superleicht abtut, sollte Denn dort steht, dass 2 + 5 = 12 ist. 3 + 6 ergibt rein rechnerisch 9. Somit ergibt sich für die letzte Rechnung: 8 + 12 = 1+4=5. 2+5+5= 3+6+12= 4+7+21= 5+8+32= 6+9+45= 7+10+60=​ 8+11+77= oder: 1+4(x1)=5. 2+5(x2)= 3+6(x3)= .

## 1+4=5 2+5=12 3+6=21 5+8= Account Options

Dieses scheinbar einfache Zahlenrätsel macht schon seit geraumer Zeit im Internet die Runde. Die Lösungen, auf die der Kollege selbst gekommen ist, lauten 40 und Die Lösung https://cosminpopan.co/casino-online-ohne-einzahlung/beste-spielothek-in-merkershausen-finden.php 40schreibt zum Beispiel Ulrike H. Um mit Inhalten von Drittanbietern zu interagieren oder diese darzustellen, brauchen wir Ihre Zustimmung. F ast Dyskalkulie Warum manche Menschen keine Zahlen verstehen können.

### 1+4=5 2+5=12 3+6=21 5+8= - Über dieses Zahlenrätsel grübelt das Internet seit einem Jahr

Habe ein Handy im funktionierenden und ordentlichen Zustand versendet. Um mit Inhalten aus Facebook und anderen sozialen Netzwerken zu interagieren oder diese darzustellen, brauchen wir Ihre Zustimmung. Neu in Digital. Vorweg: Damit es überschaubar bleibt, sind hier nur Lösungen im herkömmlichen Zehnersystem berücksichtigt. Aktualisiert: Und hier kommt das Zahlen-Rätsel: 1+4=5. 2+5= 3+6= 8+11=? 3+6 ergibt 9 - plus 12 aus dem vorherigen Ergebnis Auf diese. * 4,7 * 4,2 * 4,2 1,6 2,3 2,0 1,7 1,4 - <5 <5 <5 Botsuana 19 23 27 25 15,3 * 15,1 10,7 8,9 * 6,0 8,3 9,9 5,7 13,4 15,5 15,9 13,2 Brasilien 11 10 9 6 6,1 * 4,5 3. 4,5 3,2 2,5 24,6 13,° 11,9 IO,6 8,8 6,7 5," 4,» 9,9 9,° 7,8 6,4 4,7 3,3 2,6 3 32,i 26,9 20,5 15,5 12,8 32,> 29,3 25,6 21,1 15,6 11,2 8,8 43ß 41,0 37,».

You also have to note that the sequence of numbers jumps at the last line, which is an indication that something is missing — four lines to be precise.

This rules out 40 as the answer because that relies on ignoring several patterns that are present in the first three lines.

Those are: 1. The first digit always increments by 1. This graphs to a straight line. The second digit also increments by 1.

This also graphs to a straight line 3. The solutions shown increment by an odd number that increases by 2, starting at 7, then 9.

The next steps would be 11, then 13, then 15, etc. This graphs to a straight line as well. You can solve each line by taking the previous answer, adding the difference between it and the one prior to it, and adding two.

The solution to each line always works out to the two values multiplied together, plus the first value.

So, right away, we have five graphs that form straight lines, which makes everything simple. The next increment values are easily determined for all steps in the sequence, in both directions.

Prediction is one of the basic defining traits of patterns, along with the fact that they follow a repeating, well, pattern.

For the first number in each line you get 1, 2, 3, 8. The same with the second value; 4, 5, 6, Sure, you can try to wedge things like different base systems, but even those fail to provide any sense of consistency.

The last line is clearly not the next one in the sequence, so it should not be treated as such.

Wait a minute. The answer has to be Dave a thought for you. Your first paragraph is the key. If this is a maths question how can we prove the answers to the first three lines are correct and therefore find the correct answer for line four.

Everyone is working in the decimal counting system if we think outside of this we can get the answers to fit. Each answer is in a decending base starting with 6, then 5, then 4 and final 3.

If you multiply the second digit by sequential numbers beginning with 1 and the first number, the final answer should be I missed this pattern!

I used a couple others; multiple the two values then add the first, as well as add the two, plus the previous solution.

Your chosen math seemed to skip the fact that would have absorbed the you want to use which is why you received your 52 answer. Josh, your assumption is that it is a sequential mathematical series that has simply left out the steps Solving only for the presented information, 52 is an acceptable answer.

Without further parameters, such as a fifth line fully solved like lines , there is not enough information to rule out that answer or the answer of That is what I did as well.

To me the pattern is to multiply by the next number then add the other digit. It is all in what you think the pattern is.

I see the 1,2,3,8 as random numbers. I also see the 4,5,6,11 as random numbers the only true pattern would be the pattern of the answer multiplied by the next number and then added.

The solutions 40, 96 and 19 are correct. If you take the previous row solution and add it to the sum of the next row, the solution is If you take the 1st number, add it to the 2nd number then multiply that sum by the 1st number the solution is If you just add the last row you get Actually the only valid answer is U times them both then add the first number to wat u got.

I came up with the same equation and got You added the 2nd instead of the first. This is the correct method because all the correct answers are on a parabolic curve.

I suppose it is positional numeral system with usual rules of arithmetic. I suppose left side of all equations is in radix of I suppose right side of all equations is in different radix.

First is in radix of six, second is in radix of five, third is in radix of four, four is in radix of three.

For every next equation radix is lowered by one. Everybody who answered 96 or 40 were fooled by the fact the lines 2 and 3 in the puzzle are incorrect.

This caused them to seek out patterns to justify these wrong answers. They got 40 by adding horizontally with operators that are not in the equation.

That is pure truth. They are incorrect. You are correct. It is amazing how this riddle truly stumps. Folks are overthinking. The answer is always I responded to a shared FB posting.

The vast majority answered 96 or In fact, all the convoluted-arithmetic answers assume it is a trick, or a puzzle to be solved.

That only holds true for some numbering systems. The FACT of it is another matter entirely. The other solutions present a consistent logic within the context of the problem, while yours chooses to disregard the given information which does not conform to your hypothesis.

Unless I am misreading something. We are so accustomed to the decimal number system that we sometimes forget that it is not the only one there.

Those who have not understood me yet: our numbering system is called decimal that has 10 symbols including zero to represent all numbers there, so when you get to nine we just all symbols and to represent the ten use a figure and we repeat representing it as After observing all this, we realize that in the first line the result is in the numbering system with base 6 and as in this system five is represented as 5 as in the decimal makes us believe that in that line does not pass nothing weird.

And we have the sequence: the first line is numbering system with base 6, second base 5 row, third base 4 line, so in the fourth line, where the question is asked, it is with base 3.

In the numbering system based on March 19 it is represented as Brilliant pattern to see, but who says we need to respect the equal signs and plus signs, when so many other of these riddles on the internet certainly imply some other function besides standard operations as we know them?

Also you are wrong about that being the only way to still respect the plus signs and the equal signs anyway.

That will also make each equation correct and preserve the meaning of the equal signs just as well as the descending base numbering system will.

So, it works out well. If there is more than one correct answer then why we must prefer or even consider much more complex solution over much more simple?

I believe simple solution is always better than complex if they are both correct. You only change your perception of the representative numerals.

The pattern is simple, where the hell did all this multiplication come from? There are only addition symbols in this puzzle.

The answer is It has to be All of the symbols have precise meanings. There is no multiplication indicated. I agree with you and others that the riddle, as stated, is essentially mis-stated.

Solve for? This reminds me of reading years ago about Einstein causing his math professors grief when he kept telling them that their exam questions had no single correct answer because they could have multiple answers.

A simple example was determining the next number in the sequence 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Two possible answers were 6 and Finally someone who understands math.

I see so many people trying to make sense of this simple addition while violating every math principle known to man ok maybe not every principle but you get my drift …LOL.

It seems you are wrong. What we see in our example? Set of symbols, not more, not less. Then we must decide — are that symbols numbers?

If they are numbers then we must check is it positional notation? If it is then we must find radix. And only after such steps we may try to solve that puzzle.

What if that puzzle is fake after all and has no right answer? The most reasonable single answer is This would open the gates for stupid puzzles with multiple answers.

For decent puzzle making, esp of this kind, only one, reasonable answer should be possible, having an elegance that suggests simplicity in logic, yet devious, convoluted or obscure procedure.

The solution you have admits other possibilities, not only 96 but 40 and others. So the reasonable single answer involves the numbers on the left to base 10 yet the numbers on the right to bases 6 down to 3 in the last equation.

Adding 8 to 11 gives 19base 10 which is base 3. Numbers to different bases that are not shown, do not involve other operators or numbers that are missing or in error.

If the answer is as you gave, 96, then this is a sloppy excuse of a puzzle, will only cause suffering of those genuinely attempting to answer a genuine bona fide puzzle.

Remember Me. Puzzle You May Like. Email me at this address if a comment is added after mine: Email me if a comment is added after mine.

Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Email me if my answer is selected or commented on.

## 3 thoughts on “1+4=5 2+5=12 3+6=21 5+8=”

1. Gohn says:

der sehr interessante Gedanke

2. Akilrajas says:

Was es sich ВЄ ergibt?

3. Mokasa says:

Ist nicht einverstanden